That makes it all the more peculiar. Ping the gateway and then check your pc's arp cache to see if it even has the gateway's MAC. _________________ Read the forum announcements thoroughly! Be cautious if you're inexperienced.
Available for paid consulting. (Don't PM about complicated setups otherwise)
Looking for bricks and spare routers to expand my collection. (not interested in G spec models)
MAC from gateway is there! Also I've added some iptables rules to WRT54GL, but I can't get response either from 192.168.8.2 (WRT54GL) nor 192.168.8.1 (linux box). Rules are:
I didn't gave up, but only a small update: I can see macs with arp, I've removed bridge br0 from WRT54GL and corrected the rule, vlan4 is actually 192.168.4.2, vlan5 is 192.168.8.2. Here's also my pastebin with routing tables from client, WRT54GL and linux box. I've added iptables-save -c from linux box as well: http://pastebin.com/m5102f550
1) How to make the same trunk on WAN port?
2) How to use a different subnet for each port with this trunk? The subnets must communicate with each other.
3) Do I need to use jffs as the guide said?
I think what you have to do to get wireless with a vlan is to create a bridge and add the vlan and the wireless interfaces to it and assign a subnet to the bridge.
My setup is almost finished, I just have one last problem: I've unbridged vlan6 to put an static ip to be able to access the router's administration page, it works fine for wired clients, but not for wireless. I've also unbridged wireless and created bridge br1 and assigned eth1 (wireless) and vlan4 to it, wireless clients can get ip from vlan4 but can't access router's administration page. Router's administration page is ip 192.168.75.2, linux box eth0.4 has ip 192.168.75.1, wireless clients can ping 192.168.75.1 but not 192.168.75.2, what am I doing wrong?
My setup is almost finished, I just have one last problem: I've unbridged vlan6 to put an static ip to be able to access the router's administration page, it works fine for wired clients, but not for wireless. I've also unbridged wireless and created bridge br1 and assigned eth1 (wireless) and vlan4 to it, wireless clients can get ip from vlan4 but can't access router's administration page. Router's administration page is ip 192.168.75.2, linux box eth0.4 has ip 192.168.75.1, wireless clients can ping 192.168.75.1 but not 192.168.75.2, what am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Isn't that actually the address of eth0.6? What address did you assign to br1 and can you ping br1's address? You should be able to access the router config directly with any of it's addresses. _________________ Read the forum announcements thoroughly! Be cautious if you're inexperienced.
Available for paid consulting. (Don't PM about complicated setups otherwise)
Looking for bricks and spare routers to expand my collection. (not interested in G spec models)
Yes, sorry, eth0.4 has 192.168.8.1, br1 has no ip, I thought I wouldn't need it as wireless clients are getting proper ip. So, I just need to put 192.168.8.2 for br1, correct?
Yes, sorry, eth0.4 has 192.168.8.1, br1 has no ip, I thought I wouldn't need it as wireless clients are getting proper ip. So, I just need to put 192.168.8.2 for br1, correct?
Yes it should have an IP assigned to it but there's no telling if it will fix anything with the vlans. At the very least the wireless should be able to access the router via the IP you assign to br1. _________________ Read the forum announcements thoroughly! Be cautious if you're inexperienced.
Available for paid consulting. (Don't PM about complicated setups otherwise)
Looking for bricks and spare routers to expand my collection. (not interested in G spec models)
Forget what I said earlier, wired clients can only access 192.168.75.2 if connected to the vlan that has that subnet. Is there a way for all subnets have access to 192.168.75.2 and both wireless and wired?