Aha, so there we have it! That is exactly what I and some others have described, when having the self refreshing page with stats open you get high(er) loads. _________________ If you use DD-WRT, you HAVE to make a donation! See this topic too: http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=228
I never really realized how much CPU using syslog actually takes. This is especially true when doing any P2P (worst probably with Bittorrent, especially with DHT). The CPU usage for syslogd at one point was 50%, and the highest thing on the list
SuperG
I'm wondering, but does that effect last when you stop using DHT? Mainline DHT has the side-effect of sending DHT-UDP packets to you for almost a week after your last connection (at about one packet every two seconds). Eats up 10 to 20MB of bandwidth a day
I never really realized how much CPU using syslog actually takes. This is especially true when doing any P2P (worst probably with Bittorrent, especially with DHT). The CPU usage for syslogd at one point was 50%, and the highest thing on the list
SuperG
I'm wondering, but does that effect last when you stop using DHT? Mainline DHT has the side-effect of sending DHT-UDP packets to you for almost a week after your last connection (at about one packet every two seconds). Eats up 10 to 20MB of bandwidth a day
It does, just not as much, the packets are less frequent for me, then when the torrent is actually running.
Also, if and when it gets real bad, I just force a new IP address from my provider, then all gone :)
I enabled the PPTP server, and worked fine, however after the PPTP client disconnecting, bcrelay started to eat up CPU resources. After several hours of running the load average was about 1.10. After a "kill -HUP bcrelay" the load went back to 0.02.
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 21:55 Post subject: Re: bcrelay cpu usage
jkondas wrote:
I enabled the PPTP server, and worked fine, however after the PPTP client disconnecting, bcrelay started to eat up CPU resources. After several hours of running the load average was about 1.10. After a "kill -HUP bcrelay" the load went back to 0.02.
Update: the CPU load is caused by high Internet traffic, but it is unclear, how bcrelay fits into this. The traffic is unicast, so not related to broadcast packets (does bcrelay intercept *all* traffic on the br0 interface?).
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 81 Location: Salamanca, Spain, Europe.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:21 Post subject:
I didn't want to open a new thread so I'll put it here. Why aren't the changelogs being updated every once in a while? v24 changelog is from 2005 :-/ _________________ WRT54GL now using Tomato
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7492 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 17:53 Post subject:
heffeque wrote:
I didn't want to open a new thread so I'll put it here. Why aren't the changelogs being updated every once in a while? v24 changelog is from 2005 :-/
you can get the changelog informations from the bug tracker too (look for resolved entries) _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s